Thursday, May 6th, 2010...6:44 am
Making Managerial Decisions in Arabic Translation, Japanese Document Translation and Russian Document Translation Corporations
The world of business is large, complex, continuously shifting and evolving. Therefore, the intentions of business decision makers are not always known.As a result, Japanese Translation workers suggest that business must operate on the assumption that management’s primary goal is stockholder wealth maximization, which translates into maximizing the price of the firm’s common stock. Naturally, the optimization of stock price is not the only concern that business makers consider when executing a decision. For example, managers might also consider their own personal desires, the consequences to employees, and the effects on a community. Although alternative criteria may enter into the decision making process, an ethical manager will always place the greatest consideration on how it will influence stock price. Arabic Document Translation Stockholders own the firm and elect the management team. As the management team is controlled by stockholders, their very existence is based on their ability to conform with the wishes of stockholders..
But while the responsibility of the management team seems clearly defined, often different groups of stockholders emerge that have different objectives. This is one reason why management decisions can be very complicating and why profit maximization policies may not always be persued. For example, some have argued that the managers of a large, well-entrenched corporation could work just hard enough to keep stockholder returns at a reasonable level and then devote the remainder of their efforts and resources to public service activities, to employee benefits, to higher executive salaries, or to golf.
Therefore, it is often impossible to follow the decision making actions of decision makers in an effort to ensure they comply with the best wishes of the stock holders. For example, how can Russian Document Translation workers tell whether employee or community benefit programs are in the long- run best interests of the stockholders? Similarly, are relatively high executive salaries really necessary to attract and retain excellent managers, or just another example of managers? Taking advantage of stockholders?
Regardless, in a competitive free market economy most managers will act in a way that is in the best interests of stockholders or they will be replaced by employees with better intentions. When stockholders lose complete faith in a management team, a proxy fight might occur or the company might become ripe for hostile takeover action.
A hostile takeover is the purchase by one company of the stock of another over the opposition of its management, whereas a proxy fight involves an attempt to gain control by getting stockholders to vote a new management group into place. In most cases, the firm that is the target of a takeover attempt will either try to increase the value of the stock or make it unattractive to potential parties in the acquisition attempt.
Corporate leaders must also make a choice between their commitments to being socially responsible in lieu of profit maximization. Such questions as whether a company should forgo charitable contributions and outstanding employee benefits must be weighed against maximizing the value of stock.
There is little doubt that corporations have a moral obligation to provide a clean, safe working environment and to do their best to be good corporate citizens by not polluting the earth. On the other hand, these actions have costs that often have no direct impact on the value of the company’s stock or the benefits received by stockholders. If some firms do act in a socially responsible manner while others do not, then the socially responsible firms will be at a disadvantage in attracting capital.




Comments are closed.